Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Game Over
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Island
Friday, December 4, 2009
Curing/Healing
I've wanted to post the following piece on this blog ever since I heard Bob Marckini read a portion of it when he was here at Loma Linda last month. He sent it to me today.
From time to time I've mentioned the idea that curing a pathology and healing a person are related but different. Both are important, but the spiritual, relational, and emotional aspects of healing give it an edge. I'd go so far as to say that curing without healing is terribly inadequate, while healing without curing is sometimes the best that can be done and, in fact, is sufficient. I first read about this difference some years ago in a book on Jesus written by John Dominic Crossan who suggested that, whether or not Jesus cured diseases may be open to debate, but that he healed people is certain.
Although Loma Linda pioneered proton treatment as a cure for cancer, what really convinced me to come here was the expectation of healing. The healing has to do with Loma Linda's mission to make man whole. I have not been disappointed.
The author of the following piece is Fred Recklau, apparently a Lutheran pastoral theologian. I know nothing more about him, Googling his name will turn up multiple sites that present these contrasts. They're worth repeating here.
Cure acts upon another; Healing shares with another.
Cure manages; Healing touches.
Cure seeks ultimately to conquer pain; Healing seeks to transcend the pain.
Cure ignores grief; Healing assumes grief.
Cure encourages mystery as a challenge for understanding; Healing encounters mystery as a ready channel for meaning.
Cure rejects death and views it as defeat; Healing includes death among the blessed outcomes of caring.
Cure may occur without healing; Healing may occur without cure.
Cure separates body from soul; Healing embraces the soul.
Cure tends to isolate; Healing tends to incorporate.
Cure combats illness; Healing fosters wellness.
Treatment count: 42 down, 3 to go.
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
Discharge
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Amy
Monday, November 30, 2009
Oxnard
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Point Mugu
Friday, November 27, 2009
Dume
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Podluck
And also hula dancers—three to be exact—who each did a very credible job. Perhaps it was just as well that their costumes didn't include grass skirts.Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Contrasts
Getting back to the stories of my ancestors, what are the differences between these two accounts—“Ancestors” and “Elizabeth”—and what do the differences say about the people who own the stories?
Three contrasts jump out at me. First, Sarah’s version focuses on the male characters—in particular Jean and Peter Bert—while the German version puts a woman, Elizabeth Pastre, front and center. The gender focus goes further in the German version by portraying Elizabeth as the victim of a male–dominated community, a victim who resourcefully finds a way out.
Secondly, in Sarah’s version, Elizabeth married twice, and her sons were orphaned when her husbands died. In the German version she never married so both of her sons were illegitimate. The latter version has the ring of authenticity. I believe it is based on research in church and civic records. Furthermore, it’s easier to see the details of the latter version as the source for the first version than visa versa.
Third, religion has a different character and plays a different role in the two versions. In Sarah’s version, religion produces heroic martyrs and eventually provides Peter a home. In the second version, while religion is capable of heroism and hospitality, it also alienates Elizabeth from her home community and later divides her from her son.
So in one version we have a male-dominated moral tale in which a man leaves a religious community in the old world and finds new faith in the new world. In the other version a woman whose unfortunate romantic alliances put her at odds with a stodgy religious community flees her home only to encounter another rigid sect in the new world, one that absorbs her son.
It’s not difficult to see why Sarah, a frail Kansas farm girl and committed church member who lost her beloved father and went on to found a rescue mission for working-class immigrants in Chicago, would find inspiration and strength in the ancestral story she believed and passed on to others.
Why do I find the second version a source of personal power and pride? What does this story, that I believe, tell about me? Perhaps it says that I value drama. It suggests that I believe victims can be heroic. It suggests that I don’t see the world in comfortable black and white as much as in disquieting shades of gray, that along with my religious faith I also harbor a deep suspicion about religious institutions and practitioners.
We tell our stories, and our stories reveal us.
Had I learned what I know about my ancestors twenty years earlier, I believe I would have named my daughter Elizabeth.
Treatment count: 36 down, 9 to go.
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Seeing
Eventually I reached the oasis overlook. "Wow!" There they were, nestled down in the canyon and marching up the ravines—the largest stand of California fan palms in the Park.